DQED™: A Quantum-Informed Technique for Energetic Liberation, Rooted in Islamic Alignment
by Ra'ana Khan
Among the tools I've developed within my coaching work is the Dark Quantum Entanglement Disconnection Technique, DQED™. It's built to release the pull of old connections, memories, and emotional loops that quietly keep draining energy long after the original situation has ended.
I bring three languages together to describe this work: quantum metaphor, nervous-system regulation, and Islamic spiritual practice, tawakkul, dhikr, and qalbi-zikr, heart-centred remembrance.
Quantum entanglement itself is real, well-established physics, worth explaining simply before I borrow from it. When two particles become entangled, they form a single connected system, so that whatever happens to one instantly corresponds to the other, no matter how far apart they are. Einstein famously called this "spooky action at a distance" because it didn't sit comfortably with him, but decades of rigorous experiments have since confirmed it beyond doubt, work recognised with the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics, awarded to Alain Aspect, John Clauser, and Anton Zeilinger for proving it experimentally. Two things, once connected, keep affecting each other across distance, in a way that classical physics can't fully explain.
I also teach clients about superposition and collapse, because it's the other half of the same picture. Before a quantum system is observed, it doesn't hold one single, settled state. It holds many possible states at once, a superposition, and it's only the act of observation that resolves it into one definite outcome, what physicists call collapse. What causes that collapse, and whether consciousness itself plays any part in it, is one of the genuinely open questions in physics. A serious historical position within quantum theory, the von Neumann-Wigner interpretation, held that a conscious observer is what completes the collapse, that without a mind registering the outcome, it stays unresolved. Most physicists have since moved away from that view, and Wigner himself later stepped back from it, but a 2016 analysis of the idea concluded that it may be fundamentally unfalsifiable, meaning no experiment, even in principle, can prove or disprove it. It sits in genuinely unsettled territory, not a claim I'm stretching past what the physics allows.
I use that image, an unresolved superposition brought to a single, settled outcome through conscious observation, as the clearest way I have of describing what DQED™ actually does to an entangled cord. Before the work, that entanglement sits in an unresolved state: still active, still capable of pulling in either direction, still undecided. The deliberate, conscious attention a client brings to the disconnection is what collapses it, resolves it into a single, settled outcome, released rather than lingering. I use entanglement and collapse together as a lens for something relational rather than a literal claim that human consciousness collapses wave functions in the physicist's sense, and I'll say that once here rather than keep circling back to it. What I've watched happen with clients, again and again, is real: shifts in nervous system state, in emotional charge, and in the practical shape of a person's life afterward.
What DQED™ Addresses
Unseen threads keep us tied to people, memories, or incidents long after the physical connection has ended. In coaching terms, this shows up as:
- Energy that feels drained by a person or situation, even from a distance
- Subconscious loops and patterns that keep repeating in relationships
- A nervous system that stays on edge around certain memories or people
- A sense of being held back from moving toward what you actually want
DQED™ works with these patterns directly, combining breathwork, guided attention, and remembrance practice, within the context of a client's broader coaching journey.
How These Entanglements Actually Form
We entangle energetically with almost everyone we interact with, but the strongest cords form through physical and emotional connection. When you're bonded to someone whose own limiting or distorted beliefs, or whose negative state born from their own deviation from fitrah, sits close to you, that darkness can affect you through the cord, whether they intend it or not. These cords don't automatically dissolve when the physical connection ends. They can remain long after, which is exactly the category of entanglement DQED™ exists to address.
This is part of why zina is forbidden. The physical act of intimacy creates a genuine energetic bond, and the Qur'an doesn't only forbid the act itself, it forbids even approaching it: "And do not approach unlawful sexual intercourse. Indeed, it is ever an immorality and is evil as a way" (Qur'an 17:32, Sahih International). Outside a halal partnership, that bond becomes an anchor, and it's exactly why people who've been involved in zina so often carry multiple entangled attachments that keep resurfacing, long after the relationship itself is over. This is precisely the kind of cord DQED™ is built to sever, and part of why I never treat it as a technique for vague, general negativity. It has a specific job: releasing entanglements this real and this deeply rooted.
Zina doesn't stop at the physical act, either. The Prophet ﷺ described a wider share of it that touches the eyes, the ears, the tongue, the hands, and the feet: "The adultery of the eye is the lustful look, the adultery of the ears is listening to voluptuous talk, the adultery of the tongue is licentious speech, the adultery of the hand is the lustful grip, and the adultery of the feet is walking toward it" (Sahih al-Bukhari 6612; Sahih Muslim 2657, authenticity agreed upon). Each of these lesser forms creates its own entanglement. Every one of them leaks energy and pulls at the same magnetic, manifesting capacity the greater act does, even when nothing physical has happened at all. DQED™ works with these lighter, more common entanglements just as directly as it does the deeper ones, since the mechanism holding them in place, belief and cord together, is the same regardless of how the entanglement first formed.
Belief is the key factor that establishes our state and our frequency, and this is the actual foundation DQED™ is built on, not a decorative idea sitting alongside the technique, but the reason it works the way it does. Cutting an energetic cord without touching the belief that let it form in the first place is like clearing a wound and leaving the infection behind. The cord reforms, or a new one takes its place, because the belief that made the entanglement possible never moved. This is exactly why DQED™ works at both levels in the same session: the belief and the cord, together, not one before the other.
This isn't a coaching assumption sitting on faith alone. In one landmark study, hotel housekeepers were simply told their daily work counted as good exercise, with no change to their actual behaviour, and a month later they showed real decreases in weight, blood pressure, body fat, and waist-to-hip ratio (Crum & Langer, 2007). Belief alone moved the body. And it runs the other way too, which is what makes this foundational to DQED™ rather than incidental: in a pooled analysis of randomized, double-blind studies, over a hundred entirely healthy volunteers were given a plain saline injection, nothing inflammatory, nothing capable of making anyone ill. Some of them, for unrelated reasons, mistakenly believed they'd been given the inflammatory substance instead. That belief alone was enough. They went on to report real, measurable bodily sickness symptoms and a genuinely worse mood than the volunteers who knew correctly they'd only received the placebo (Benson & Elsenbruch, 2019). Nothing entered their bodies that could account for it except the belief itself.
This is precisely the mechanism DQED™ is built around, in reverse. If a wrongly held belief can make a healthy body respond as though it's under genuine attack, then a belief that's identified, addressed, and consciously released at the subconscious level, exactly what happens in this technique, is what lets the body stand down from an entanglement it's been bracing against, sometimes for years. The energetic disconnection isn't working on the cord alone. It's working on the belief holding the cord in place, and that's the actual reason the technique produces change that holds rather than change that quietly reverses once the session ends.
Intention matters just as much as belief here. The brain itself runs on electrochemical signaling, real, measurable electrical activity you can pick up on an EEG (Kandel, Schwartz & Jessell, 2013). I use "thoughts and intention are energy" as a bridge from that established fact into something the physics of it can't fully capture: that a focused intention behind an action carries a different weight than a passive one. Since the entanglements this work addresses are themselves energetic, the disconnection has to be entered into with clear, deliberate intention to actually take hold. This isn't a passive process you drift through. Islam already places intention at the very centre of what makes an action real: "Actions are but by intentions, and every man shall have only that which he intended" (Sahih al-Bukhari 1; Sahih Muslim 1907, agreed upon, and the hadith Imam al-Bukhari chose to open his entire collection with). The same principle holds here. When a client sets a genuine, focused intention to sever a specific cord, that intention is part of what makes the disconnection real rather than symbolic.
Places and Objects Carry Residue Too
This isn't limited to people, and it's worth understanding as the same underlying principle DQED™ works with, just showing up in a different form. During the expedition of Tabuk, the Prophet ﷺ and his companions passed through Al-Hijr, the land of the Thamud, the people destroyed for their disbelief. He told them plainly: "Do not enter upon these people who are being punished, except in a weeping state, lest the same calamity as of theirs should befall you" (Sahih al-Bukhari 4420). Other narrations of that same journey record him instructing the companions not to drink from the wells there and to hasten their pace through the area rather than linger. A place where Allah's wrath descended on a people carries something you're instructed to move through with humility and remembrance, not to treat casually or make a resting stop. What that instruction tells me is that residue outlasting direct contact isn't a fringe idea in this tradition. It's the same logic DQED™ applies to a person, rather than a place: something can linger long after the original event, and how you move through it, or release it, matters.
Objects carry something too, and the tradition establishes this clearly in one direction: the Prophet's ﷺ own hair, sweat, and belongings were kept and sought out by the companions for barakah, blessing, after his passing (Sahih al-Bukhari, Book of Clothes 5446, and other narrations of the companions' practice). I'll be straightforward that mainstream scholarship restricts this specific practice, tabarruk, to the Prophet's own relics, and doesn't extend it by analogy to ordinary people's belongings. What I take from it, as my own extension rather than an equivalent ruling, is the underlying principle: an object can genuinely carry something of the person connected to it. If that holds in the direction of blessing, I think it's coherent that it can also hold in the direction of residue and negativity, which is why exchanging or wearing another person's clothes and belongings, especially where there's already an unhealthy attachment, can bring some of what belongs to them along with it. This is exactly why letting go of specific physical items, not just the person or memory, often comes up as part of the work when a client and I are addressing a cord through DQED™. The object is rarely the whole entanglement, but it can be part of what's keeping it anchored.
This is part of why I emphasise taking in halal through every sense, not only through food. The Prophet ﷺ warned that flesh nourished by unlawful sustenance is not fit for Paradise (Jami' at-Tirmidhi 2609, graded Hasan Gharib), and the earlier teaching on the "zina" of the eyes, ears, and tongue makes the same point about what we let ourselves see, hear, and take in more broadly. What you surround yourself with, wear, watch, and listen to isn't neutral. It's part of what you're entangled with, and it's also the preventative half of what DQED™ does on its own. Guarding your senses reduces how many new cords form in the first place. DQED™ is there for the ones that already have.
How This Connects to Recognized Islamic Concepts
I don't treat "unseen ties" as a vague, borrowed idea. Islamic tradition already names several of the things clients describe when they come to this work, and each one is a real source of the entanglements DQED™ is designed to address.
The evil eye (al-'ayn). The Prophet ﷺ said, "The evil eye is real" (Sahih al-Bukhari 5740; Sahih Muslim 2188), one of the most firmly established concepts in the tradition. When a client's fatigue or stuck pattern traces back to another person's envious gaze rather than their own history, that's a cord DQED™ can work with directly.
Envy (hasad). The Qur'an instructs seeking refuge "from the evil of an envier when he envies" (Qur'an 113:5, Sahih International). Envy is treated as something with real capacity to harm, and it forms exactly the kind of entangling cord this technique severs.
Magic (sihr). The same surah instructs seeking refuge "from the evil of the blowers in knots" (Qur'an 113:4, Sahih International), a reference classical commentators connect to those who practice sihr.
Harmful companionship. The Prophet ﷺ compared companionship to a perfume seller and a blacksmith: "from the first you would either buy musk or enjoy its good smell, while the [blacksmith's bellows] would either burn your clothes... or you would get a bad, nasty smell" (Sahih al-Bukhari 2101; Sahih Muslim 2628). Who you sit with rubs off on you, and the residue of a harmful companionship is one of the most common cords a client and I address in this work.
Where a client's situation looks like genuine evil eye or sihr specifically, I point them toward the tradition's own prescribed remedies, seeking refuge through Qur'an and dua, alongside this work, not instead of it. DQED™ works with the emotional, subconscious, and energetic residue that these entanglements, and the ordinary human ones, envy, bad company, painful attachments, tend to leave behind.
Where This Draws From
Nervous system regulation. Slow, guided breathwork is well documented to support the parasympathetic nervous system, the body's built-in way of downshifting out of fight-or-flight (Porges, 2011; Russo, Santarelli & O'Rourke, 2017). I lean on that groundwork here, the same way I do in Heart-Breath Meditation.
Applied psychology and NLP-informed technique. Some of what happens in DQED™ specifically draws on subconscious-focused approaches from NLP: working with symbol and imagery, working somatically rather than only conversationally, and supporting emotional release through the body rather than argument alone. This is the layer of the technique that reaches the belief itself, not just the cord, which is the part I keep coming back to as the actual reason this work holds.
Islamic spiritual practice. Qalbi-zikr, the Allah-Hoo breath, and tawakkul sit at the centre of the technique. The Qur'an ties remembrance directly to the heart's rest: "Verily, in the remembrance of Allah do hearts find rest" (Qur'an 13:28, Muhsin Khan translation). And on tawakkul: "And whoever relies upon Allah, then He is sufficient for him" (Qur'an 65:3, Sahih International).
There's a hadith I come back to often for this balance between doing the work and trusting Allah with the outcome. A man asked the Prophet ﷺ whether he should leave his camel untied and simply trust Allah, or tie it first. The Prophet ﷺ told him to tie it, and then trust Allah (Sunan al-Tirmidhi 2517, graded Hasan by Al-Albani, though at-Tirmidhi himself and some later scholars marked it weak). DQED™ is the tying of the camel, the deliberate, structured part. Tawakkul is what happens after.
What Clients Notice Afterward
- Old memories or dreams connected to the released situation surfacing briefly, then settling, rather than lingering
- A growing sense of emotional neutrality where there used to be a charge
- Natural distance forming with people or situations that once pulled at you
- A lighter, steadier feeling day to day
Somatic release doesn't always feel gentle on the way through, and this is worth naming plainly as part of what a DQED™ session can bring up, not something separate from it. Headaches, flu-like symptoms, and a general drained or low-energy feeling can show up in the day or two after a session. This lines up with what body-based trauma work has long documented: stored survival energy, the fight, flight, or freeze response that never fully discharged at the time, can surface physically as it finally releases (Levine, 1997). I see this as the body recalibrating, adjusting to years of stored trauma finally leaving its system after the cord and the belief behind it have both been addressed, sometimes alongside a real shift in core identity, which the body registers as significant even when it's a good change. These reactions tend to settle within a day or two, and settling is the operative word: they should ease, not deepen. If something feels severe, doesn't pass, or you're ever unsure whether what you're feeling is this kind of recalibration or something else entirely, please check in with your doctor and with me rather than assuming it will resolve on its own.
Every client's experience is different. If something resurfaces in the days after a session, that's the process settling, not a sign anything's gone wrong.
Aftercare
After a session, I guide clients toward a few simple things: gentle redirection rather than dwelling, using Astaghfar, Alhamdulillah, and the Allah-Hoo breath as an anchor when something old resurfaces, and giving the process time to settle rather than picking it apart immediately.
None of that means going silent or isolating yourself. If something feels heavy, that's exactly what our sessions are for, bring it back to me, or to someone else you trust. The redirection practice is a tool for the moments in between sessions, not a rule against connection or reflection.
How This Fits Into the Coaching Journey
DQED™ is taught for self-practice, the same as every technique in this work, but only once a client has moved through the systematic training, regulation, and safety process that leads to it. It's introduced at a specific point in a client's journey, once they've built the grounding, regulation skills, and self-awareness to carry out this kind of work safely on their own, and it's always taught directly by me first, in session, before a client ever uses it alone.
If any of this resonates, a free introductory call is the place to start.
Book your free introductory call · Try the free Heart-Breath Meditation training · Check if you might be neurodivergent · To learn more check out the website
References
Benson, S. & Elsenbruch, S. (2019) 'No reason to feel sick? Nocebo responses in the placebo arms of experimental endotoxemia studies', Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, article 511.
Crum, A.J. & Langer, E.J. (2007) 'Mind-set matters: Exercise and the placebo effect', Psychological Science, 18(2), pp. 165–171.
de Barros, J.A. & Oas, G. (2017) 'Can we falsify the consciousness-causes-collapse hypothesis in quantum mechanics?', Foundations of Physics, 47(9), pp. 1204–1223.
Kandel, E.R., Schwartz, J.H. & Jessell, T.M. (eds.) (2013) Principles of Neural Science, 5th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Levine, P.A. (1997) Waking the Tiger: Healing Trauma. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.
Nobel Prize in Physics 2022, awarded to Alain Aspect, John F. Clauser, and Anton Zeilinger, 'for experiments with entangled photons, establishing the violation of Bell inequalities and pioneering quantum information science'. Consulted via NobelPrize.org.
Porges, S.W. (2011) The Polyvagal Theory: Neurophysiological Foundations of Emotions, Attachment, Communication, and Self-Regulation. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Russo, M.A., Santarelli, D.M. & O'Rourke, D. (2017) 'The physiological effects of slow breathing in the healthy human', Breathe, 13(4), pp. 298–309.
Wigner, E.P. (1961) 'Remarks on the mind-body question', in Good, I.J. (ed.) The Scientist Speculates. London: Heinemann.
Qur'an 13:28, Muhsin Khan translation. Consulted via Quran.com.
Qur'an 17:32, Sahih International translation. Consulted via Quran.com.
Qur'an 65:3, Sahih International translation. Consulted via Quran.com.
Qur'an 113:4–5, Sahih International translation. Consulted via Quran.com.
Sahih al-Bukhari 1; Sahih Muslim 1907, narrated by 'Umar ibn al-Khattab, on intention, agreed upon. Consulted via Sunnah.com.
Sahih al-Bukhari 4420, narrated Ibn 'Umar, on Al-Hijr and the Thamud. Consulted via Sunnah.com.
Sahih al-Bukhari 6612; Sahih Muslim 2657, on the zina of the senses, authenticity agreed upon. Consulted via Sunnah.com.
Sahih al-Bukhari 5740; Sahih Muslim 2188, on the evil eye. Consulted via Sunnah.com.
Sahih al-Bukhari 2101; Sahih Muslim 2628, on companionship, authenticity agreed upon. Consulted via Sunnah.com.
Sahih al-Bukhari, Book of Clothes, Hadith 5446, and related narrations, on tabarruk with the Prophet's relics. Consulted via Sunnah.com.
Jami' at-Tirmidhi 2609, graded Hasan Gharib, on sustenance and what nourishes the body. Consulted via Sunnah.com.
Sunan al-Tirmidhi 2517, narrated by Anas ibn Malik, graded Hasan by Al-Albani. Consulted via Sunnah.com.
Client experiences are individual and not guaranteed. SIM™ Consciousness Coaching is a non-clinical coaching practice and is not a substitute for psychotherapy, psychiatric treatment, or medical care. If you are in emotional distress, please also reach out to a licensed professional or trusted support in addition to any coaching work.
Benson, S. & Elsenbruch, S. (2019) 'No reason to feel sick? Nocebo responses in the placebo arms of experimental endotoxemia studies', Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, article 511.
Crum, A.J. & Langer, E.J. (2007) 'Mind-set matters: Exercise and the placebo effect', Psychological Science, 18(2), pp. 165–171.
de Barros, J.A. & Oas, G. (2017) 'Can we falsify the consciousness-causes-collapse hypothesis in quantum mechanics?', Foundations of Physics, 47(9), pp. 1204–1223.
Kandel, E.R., Schwartz, J.H. & Jessell, T.M. (eds.) (2013) Principles of Neural Science, 5th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Levine, P.A. (1997) Waking the Tiger: Healing Trauma. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.
Nobel Prize in Physics 2022, awarded to Alain Aspect, John F. Clauser, and Anton Zeilinger, 'for experiments with entangled photons, establishing the violation of Bell inequalities and pioneering quantum information science'. Consulted via NobelPrize.org.
Porges, S.W. (2011) The Polyvagal Theory: Neurophysiological Foundations of Emotions, Attachment, Communication, and Self-Regulation. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Russo, M.A., Santarelli, D.M. & O'Rourke, D. (2017) 'The physiological effects of slow breathing in the healthy human', Breathe, 13(4), pp. 298–309.
Wigner, E.P. (1961) 'Remarks on the mind-body question', in Good, I.J. (ed.) The Scientist Speculates. London: Heinemann.
Qur'an 13:28, Muhsin Khan translation. Consulted via Quran.com.
Qur'an 17:32, Sahih International translation. Consulted via Quran.com.
Qur'an 65:3, Sahih International translation. Consulted via Quran.com.
Qur'an 113:4–5, Sahih International translation. Consulted via Quran.com.
Sahih al-Bukhari 1; Sahih Muslim 1907, narrated by 'Umar ibn al-Khattab, on intention, agreed upon. Consulted via Sunnah.com.
Sahih al-Bukhari 4420, narrated Ibn 'Umar, on Al-Hijr and the Thamud. Consulted via Sunnah.com.
Sahih al-Bukhari 6612; Sahih Muslim 2657, on the zina of the senses, authenticity agreed upon. Consulted via Sunnah.com.
Sahih al-Bukhari 5740; Sahih Muslim 2188, on the evil eye. Consulted via Sunnah.com.
Sahih al-Bukhari 2101; Sahih Muslim 2628, on companionship, authenticity agreed upon. Consulted via Sunnah.com.
Sahih al-Bukhari, Book of Clothes, Hadith 5446, and related narrations, on tabarruk with the Prophet's relics. Consulted via Sunnah.com.
Jami' at-Tirmidhi 2609, graded Hasan Gharib, on sustenance and what nourishes the body. Consulted via Sunnah.com.
Sunan al-Tirmidhi 2517, narrated by Anas ibn Malik, graded Hasan by Al-Albani. Consulted via Sunnah.com.
Comments
Post a Comment